Home Products Industries Applications Solutions Support Blog Contact Us
Back to Blog
Nov 18, 2020·5 min read
blog 1436 opposing consumption trends for sugar sweetened beverages an

Opposing Consumption Trends for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Plain Drinking Water: Analyses of NHANES 2011 – 16 Data

Opposing Consumption Trends for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Plain Drinking Water: Analyses of NHANES 2011 – 16 Data

Sugary Drinks Vs Drinking Water Consumption Trends is a critical aspect of modern water treatment. AMPAC USA provides industry-leading solutions that ensure safe, clean water for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Our systems are engineered for maximum contaminant removal and long-term reliability.

  • 1MS-Nutrition, 27 bld Jean Moulin, Faculté de Médecine la Timone, Laboratoire C2VN, Marseille, France
  • 2PepsiCo Inc., Purchase, NY, United States
  • 3Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States

Background: Choosing water in place of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) can reduce added sugars while maintaining adequate hydration. The present goal was to examine 2011–16 time trends in SSB vs. water consumption across US population subgroups.

Methods: Dietary intake data for 22,716 persons aged >4 years came from two 24-h dietary recalls in successive cycles of the National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES 2011–16). Water intakes (in mL/d) from plain water (tap and bottled) and from beverages (SSB and not-SSB) were the principal outcome variables. Intakes were analyzed by age group, income to poverty ratio (IPR), and race/ethnicity. Time trends by demographics were also examined.

Results: SSB and water intakes followed distinct social gradients. Most SSB was consumed by Non-Hispanic Black and lower-income groups. Most tap water was consumed by Non-Hispanic White and higher-income groups. During 2011–16, water from SSB declined from 322 to 262 mL/d (p < 0.005), whereas plain water increased (1,011–1,144 mL/d) (p < 0.05). Groups aged <30 years reduced SSB consumption (p < 0.0001) but it was groups aged >30 years that increased drinking water (p < 0.001). Non-Hispanic White groups reduced SSB and increased tap water consumption. Non-Hispanic Black and lower income groups reduced SSB and increased bottled water, not tap.

Conclusion: The opposing time trends in SSB and water consumption were not uniform across age groups or sociodemographic strata. Only the non-Hispanic White population reduced SSB and showed a corresponding increase in tap water. Lower-income and minority groups consumed relatively little plain drinking water from the tap.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2020.587123/full

The post Opposing Consumption Trends for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Plain Drinking Water: Analyses of NHANES 2011–16 Data appeared first on Facts About Water.

Source: Water Feed

What flow rates are available for emergency water treatment?

AMPAC USA's emergency systems range from 1,500 GPD portable units to 50,000+ GPD trailer-mounted systems. Military-specification units are available for forward operating base deployment, producing potable water meeting EPA and WHO drinking water standards from virtually any source.

Are emergency RO systems suitable for disaster relief operations?

Yes. AMPAC USA's emergency systems are used by FEMA, the U.S. military, and international NGOs for disaster relief. They treat flood water, contaminated groundwater, and brackish sources, removing bacteria, viruses, and chemical contaminants to produce safe drinking water on-site.

What power sources can emergency water purification systems use?

AMPAC USA's emergency systems can run on generator power (120/240V or 480V 3-phase), solar panels with battery backup, or vehicle power take-off (PTO). Low-power models consume as little as 0.5 kW, making them viable for off-grid deployment.

How durable are military-grade water purification systems?

AMPAC USA's military systems are built to MIL-SPEC standards with stainless steel frames, powder-coated components, and UV-resistant materials. They are designed to operate in temperatures from -20°F to 120°F and are vibration-tested for transport in military vehicles.

Conclusion

This post highlighted how emergency and military-grade water purification systems provide safe drinking water rapidly in the most challenging field conditions. For organizations requiring deployable water treatment capability, AMPAC USA engineers portable and trailer-mounted systems built to perform wherever they are needed. Contact our team at [email protected] or (909) 548-4900 to discuss your emergency water treatment requirements.

Understanding Sugary Drinks Vs Drinking Water Consumption Trends

Water quality directly impacts health, productivity, and equipment longevity. Sugary Drinks Vs Drinking Water Consumption Trends represents one of the most important considerations for facility managers and homeowners alike. AMPAC USA engineers water treatment systems that address the full spectrum of contaminants—from dissolved solids and heavy metals to biological threats and emerging compounds.

Reverse osmosis technology forms the core of most advanced water treatment applications. RO membranes reject up to 99% of dissolved contaminants, including lead, arsenic, nitrates, fluoride, and chlorine byproducts. The semipermeable membrane allows only water molecules to pass, resulting in exceptionally pure water at the point of use.

System sizing depends on daily volume requirements, source water TDS, temperature, and recovery rate targets. Industrial systems range from 500 GPD to multi-million GPD capacity, while residential units typically operate at 50–200 GPD. Proper pre-treatment—including sediment filtration, activated carbon, and antiscalant dosing—extends membrane life and maintains peak performance. Regular monitoring of TDS rejection, pressure differential, and flow rate ensures systems operate within design parameters.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is sugary drinks vs drinking water consumption trends?

Sugary drinks vs drinking water consumption trends refers to the technology and processes used to ensure water meets safety and quality standards for drinking, industrial, and environmental use. Reverse osmosis and advanced filtration are core methods.

How does reverse osmosis improve water quality?

Reverse osmosis forces water through a semipermeable membrane that blocks dissolved salts, heavy metals, bacteria, and other contaminants—delivering water with TDS as low as 5–10 ppm compared to tap water at 150–500 ppm.

What contaminants does RO remove?

RO systems remove lead, arsenic, nitrates, fluoride, chlorine, VOCs, bacteria, and most dissolved solids—providing comprehensive protection against regulated and emerging contaminants.

How often should RO filters be replaced?

Pre-filters (sediment and carbon) should be replaced every 6–12 months. RO membranes typically last 2–5 years depending on source water quality and system usage. Annual TDS testing confirms membrane performance.

Is AMPAC USA a reliable water treatment provider?

AMPAC USA has over 25 years of experience designing and manufacturing commercial, industrial, and residential water treatment systems. All systems meet NSF/ANSI standards and are backed by technical support and extended warranties.

Scroll to Top