Home Products Industries Applications Solutions Support Insights Contact Us
Back to Blog
Aug 1, 2019·3 min read
Seasonal Variation of Water Quality in Unregulated Domestic Wells

Seasonal Variation of Water Quality in Unregulated Domestic Wells

Seasonal Variation of Water Quality in Unregulated Domestic Wells

Seasonal Well quality/”>Water Quality Variation is a big deal in today’s water treatment world. Here at AMPAC USA, we build top-tier systems that make sure homes, businesses, and industries get safe, clean water. Our systems are made to pull out as many contaminants as possible and keep working reliably for a long time.

\\n\\n

Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne 1,*,Jennifer Parks 2,Thien Tran 3,Leif Abrell 3,4,Kelly A. Reynolds 1 and Paloma I. Beamer 1

\\n

\\n

\\n

\\n

\\n

\\n

1

\\n

Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ 85724, USA

\\n

\\n

\\n

2

\\n

Friends of the Santa Cruz River, P.O. Box 4275, Tubac, AZ 85646, USA

\\n

\\n

\\n

3

\\n

Department of Soil, Water & Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA

\\n

\\n

\\n

4

\\n

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0041, USA

\\n

\\n

\\n

*

\\n

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

\\n

\\n

\\n

\\n

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 201916(9), 1569; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091569

\\n

Received: 12 April 2019 / Revised: 30 April 2019 / Accepted: 1 May 2019 / Published: 5 May 2019

\\n

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drinking Water and Health Risks)

\\n

\\n

\\n

Abstract

\\nIn the U.S., up to 14% of people rely on private wells for their drinking water. The thing is, the U.S. government doesn’t regulate contaminants in these private wells. This study wanted to check the water quality of unregulated private wells within one mile (1.6 kilometers) of an effluent-dominated river in the arid Southwest. We also wanted to see how contaminant levels changed between wet and dry seasons, and if human sources were contributing by specifically measuring man-made organic contaminants like PFOA, PFOS, and sucralose. We collected samples during two dry seasons and two wet seasons over two years. Then, we checked for microbial contaminants (Escherichia coli), inorganic ones (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nitrate), and synthetic organic ones (PFOA, PFOS, and sucralose). We found arsenic, nitrate, and Escherichia coli concentrations were higher than what’s considered safe: 0.01 mg/L, 10 mg/L, and 1 colony forming unit (CFU)/100 mL, respectively. The PFOA and PFOS levels we measured were also higher than the Public Health Advisory level. Arsenic, PFOA, PFOS, and sucralose were significantly higher during the dry seasons, but E. coli was higher during the wet seasons. Some contaminants were linked, like arsenic and mercury (r = 0.87) or PFOA and PFOS (r = 0.45). But since different types of contaminants didn’t always line up, it means they probably come from different places. We need a bunch of different approaches to help reduce exposure to drinking water that’s above health guidelines.\\n\\n

\\n

\\nThe post Seasonal Variation of Water Quality in Unregulated Domestic Wells appeared first on Facts About Water.\\n\\nSource: Water Feed

Scroll to Top